Home | Cause | Timeline | Criminal| Civil | Resolution | Final Judgments | Constitutional Right | Links

What is Sovereign Immunity?

Immunity means that a person is not subject to the Law. In other words, they can violate the Law without consequence. In the legal realm there are two types of persons. There are human or real persons and there are artificial, also referred to as creations of law. The most commonly known artificial persons are corporations and governments. They are treated as, or considered to be, 'persons' in all matters of law.

The Sovereign is the supreme ruler, as in the case of an absolute monarch or an absolute dictator. The Sovereign holds the seat of supreme or ultimate power. The Sovereign can also be a Nation of People. The people of a sovereign Nation hold the seat of supreme or ultimate power. The sovereign exercises their power, or effects their rule, through Law. With an absolute monarch or absolute dictator the laws are not written or, if written, are very flexible. They are either verbal or may be changed at the whim of the sovereign. This is referred to as arbitrary and capricious rule.

Sovereign Immunity, as a phrase, means that the Sovereign is above the Law. Or, in other words, not subject to the consequences that are imposed on others who violate the same laws. While others might be protected by the Law those who are victims of the sovereign are not.

What Law? All Law. The Laws of Nature and Nature's God where Laws are not written anywhere but upon the hearts of humans. Or in places where the Law is intended to Rule, Sovereign Immunity means the entity granted sovereign immunity is above the Law of the Constitution and Laws made in pursuance of that Constitution. In those lands, or to use the legal phrase 'jurisdictions' where a Constitution and Laws are written, those who act in the name of the entity, the artificial person created by Law, enjoy the benefit of sovereign immunity. And, with the protection of this doctrine, they can then rule over human (real) persons when wearing, or claiming to be acting under, the title of their position of employment under the artificial person, the creature of law, that has employed them, arbitrarily and capriciously. They are not bound by the Constitution and Laws. These have been reduced to suggestions they can disregard.

A Sovereign People or a Sovereign Government?

In a Nation where the people are the Sovereign, they exercise their sovereignty through a Constitution and Laws made in pursuance thereof. Absent a violation of those laws, the people, as individuals, are immune from prosecution by the government. But when a government has taken sovereignty from the people and given it to the government the Constitution and Law no longer Rules. Rather, the Constitution and Laws are reduced to nothing more than suggestions, a rough guide for government actors to follow, but that they can disregard at their will and with absolute impunity. The people then have no protection from government and its actors. That is the our current situation!

– The Opposite of Sovereign Immunity -

In looking at the definition of the sovereign, and the phrase sovereign immunity, it is good to keep in mind the definition of Liberty. Liberty is the Right to have Law protect the Individual from the Sovereign. If the Sovereign has immunity, then the Individual has no protection from the Sovereign. Liberty is the Right of the Individual secured by Law written in a plain langauge that the average human can understand. If the Law is written in a language that the average human cannot understand or is forced to rely upon the sovereign to interpret, then the law provides no protection.

The Founders of Law on our Land, beginning with our organic Law known as the Declaration of Independence of 1836, were explicitly clear and emphatic in asserting that the people are the sovereign. The people of Texas have been deprived of this foundation for government by government actors who have taken sovereignty from the people and handed it to an artificial entity. the entity know as government. They have deprived us of ownership of our government and made us slaves to it. They have unwittingly accepted this condition because they simply do not know. They believe the they still possess the Liberty that existed prior to the enactment of the immunity doctrines by the Judiciary.

The Judiciary is a Branch, or Division, of government that our Constitutions explicitly deprived of the power to make law. That power was reserved for the people to exercise through their Congress and Legislatures. But over time the Judiciary has usurped that power.

Our Constitution makes the Constitution, and the Laws of Congress, the supreme Law of the Land. But the majority of graduates of today's laws schools believe the whatever the Supreme Court decrees is the supreme Law of the Land irregardless of how contrary these decrees may be to the plain language of our Constitution.

In Europe during the dark ages when all law was based on the premise of the Divine Right of Kings, the Law was written in Latin. A language that was no common among the people in the Kingdoms aligned with the Church. Thus only the Priest could interpret (understand) the Bible and the Law. The peasants, the commoners, had to rely on the interpretation of those wearing black robes. Today Attorneys and Judges are of the belief, and want the rest of the public to believe, that the Law is, as was the case in the dark ages, written in a language that the common man cannot understand. Thus the common man must pay the Attorneys $300 a hour to ask the black robed priests, our Judges, to interpret the law for them an pray that it be in their favor.

Supremacy Clause

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.