THE LAW
The DUTY to known the Law vs. The RIGHT to know the Law
The people of TEXAS, individually as a CITIZEN, have a RIGHT to know the law.
The person granted the privilege of a LICENSE to PRACTICE law for PROFIT, by representing another person or entity (including the STATE / government) has accepted a DUTY to know the law and abide by the Law of the License.
But we have, on our Land of Texas, 722 Attorneys (licensed lawyers) practicing at the expense of the public treasury of Texas, who claim their license entitles them to plead:
IGNORANCE OF THE LAW,
as their Excuse for violating the Law of our Land of Texas.
Reports from the Houston Chronicle, as well as the experience of this Citizen, reveal the 722 Attorneys employed at taxpayer expense in the Office of the Attorney General, have made it a pattern and practice, under the policy of Greg Abbott, to engage in frivolous litigation by claiming IGNORANCE OF THE LAW, as their excuse.
In case after case they endlessly file frivolous appeals. When all the essential facts of a case are present and not subject to any question and the law applicable to those facts is not subject to any ‘reasonable’ dispute, an Attorney has both a LEGAL and a FIDUCIARY duty to END the process. But the policy in Greg Abbott’s office is to ignore the law and to keep the process going by pleading ignorance of the law.
In EVERY case known from our investigations, the policy, pattern, and practice is to ask for another review of the LAW applicable to the FACTS. They want another Judge, or another panel of Justices, to TEACH them the LAW. They claim they are IGNORANT of the LAW, cannot understand the LAW, and need another Judge or another panel of Justices to explain it to them. They act as if the Law of our Land was written in a foreign language that they cannot understand and, therefore, need to have it interpreted for them.
At the same time as they plead ignorance of the Law; they claim that no CITIZEN has the RIGHT to be able to read and understand what is written in the language common to that Citizen and the land of their birth, absent a license imposing a duty to know the Law.
A DUTY is NOT a RIGHT = a RIGHT is NOT a DUTY
Absence of a License to Practice the Law for Profit does NOT deprive the Citizen of the RIGHT to know the Law that protects them, and their property, from being taken, damaged, or destroyed by the STATE, by and through STATE ACTORS (public servants). Nor does it deprive the Citizen of the RIGHT to know a licensed professional has a DUTY to KNOW the LAW that governs the functions they are paid to perform.
Informed
|
Return to Homepage |